Thursday, April 07, 2005
The Treatment of Underdevelopment
Kristof is once again beating his fists against the indifference of the outside world to the crimes against humanity in the Darfur region of Sudan. Thousands of natives are killed and mutilated and starved to death while the world reactions hardly go beyond mincing steps that do little to change the situation. He is incensed in his latest column particularly by the rape of women and girls, rape that not only persists with little legal challenge but also destroys the girls involved socially and legally in ways not imagined in the West. The latest news is that the victims of rape in Darfur are being imprisoned for having illicit relations outside marriage. Before their arrests, they were already thrown out by their families and divorced by their husbands.
Kristof's solution is for the United States to put more pressure on its allies and the United Nations, to increase the size of intervention forces. He seems to forget the numerically worse horrors that have been going on in the eastern part of the Democratic Republic of Congo now for some years. Unlike Darfur, the United Nations has had an army there for several years and has granted it a much more active mandate than the African Union force in Darfur. Yet those on the ground, such as representatives of Doctors without Borders people, report that violence remains the main danger for the people, that the effectiveness of the UN forces seldom extends beyond the major towns.
Instead of continuing to apply Band-Aid, the world needs to hold a major conference on Africa. Such a conference would not duplicate the Berlin Conference of the 19th century but it should be as far reaching. The conference should go beyond discussing modes of intervention. It should create the means and the will to occupy and administer those parts of Africa that are likely to remain festering sores indefinitely. There needs to be a form of recolonization, which was, in effect, what the UN Trusteeship system that dated back to the League of Nations was all about. In much of Africa, the colonial blueprint of the nineteenth century needs to be torn up, to be replaced by a new blueprint more in congruence with the divisions among African peoples. These new divisions must be wards of the international community, much in the way that Bosnia remains today.
The more generalized and longer term problem that Kristof addresses in his discussion of rape is the inhumanity of so many peoples, particular Muslims, in their treatment of their women. The formerly Muslim woman in the Netherlands who has recently stood up to her tradition, rejected it, and now wants the Western world to join her has made the point heroically and forcibly. She risks death for the cause of Muslim women and we should applaud and support her cause. Political correctness and multiculturalism should not cause anyone, liberal or not, to accept as unchangeable and worthy of respect customs and attitudes that are seriously demeaning to a segment of the population, whether this be an ethnic minority or women. We must be prepared, as the Turkish generals that transformed Turkey were prepared to do in the 1920s, to delegitimize such customs. Western campaigns against female circumcision seem to be having an effect, partially because this practice is not in the Quran or the most accepted hadith literature. Success against many of the other attitudes and practices demeaning women in Islam may also be successfully campaigned against for the same reason. Perhaps the "honor killings" of wives, daughters, or sisters may be delegitimized for without touching the most essential traditions. Unfortunately, some anti-feminine strictures, such as the idea that it takes the word of two women before a court to equal that of a man, exist in the general body of Muslim law. Any international campaign to right such wrongs must begin with the easier and move to the more difficult, but the world should develop a willingness to educate and retrain people away from moral underdevelopment as much as from material underdevelopment. This development strategy should also be introduced in the trusteeship period as described above. Such a use of "colonialism" was often practiced by the British, most famously by their prohibition of the Hindu suttee in India.
Kristof's solution is for the United States to put more pressure on its allies and the United Nations, to increase the size of intervention forces. He seems to forget the numerically worse horrors that have been going on in the eastern part of the Democratic Republic of Congo now for some years. Unlike Darfur, the United Nations has had an army there for several years and has granted it a much more active mandate than the African Union force in Darfur. Yet those on the ground, such as representatives of Doctors without Borders people, report that violence remains the main danger for the people, that the effectiveness of the UN forces seldom extends beyond the major towns.
Instead of continuing to apply Band-Aid, the world needs to hold a major conference on Africa. Such a conference would not duplicate the Berlin Conference of the 19th century but it should be as far reaching. The conference should go beyond discussing modes of intervention. It should create the means and the will to occupy and administer those parts of Africa that are likely to remain festering sores indefinitely. There needs to be a form of recolonization, which was, in effect, what the UN Trusteeship system that dated back to the League of Nations was all about. In much of Africa, the colonial blueprint of the nineteenth century needs to be torn up, to be replaced by a new blueprint more in congruence with the divisions among African peoples. These new divisions must be wards of the international community, much in the way that Bosnia remains today.
The more generalized and longer term problem that Kristof addresses in his discussion of rape is the inhumanity of so many peoples, particular Muslims, in their treatment of their women. The formerly Muslim woman in the Netherlands who has recently stood up to her tradition, rejected it, and now wants the Western world to join her has made the point heroically and forcibly. She risks death for the cause of Muslim women and we should applaud and support her cause. Political correctness and multiculturalism should not cause anyone, liberal or not, to accept as unchangeable and worthy of respect customs and attitudes that are seriously demeaning to a segment of the population, whether this be an ethnic minority or women. We must be prepared, as the Turkish generals that transformed Turkey were prepared to do in the 1920s, to delegitimize such customs. Western campaigns against female circumcision seem to be having an effect, partially because this practice is not in the Quran or the most accepted hadith literature. Success against many of the other attitudes and practices demeaning women in Islam may also be successfully campaigned against for the same reason. Perhaps the "honor killings" of wives, daughters, or sisters may be delegitimized for without touching the most essential traditions. Unfortunately, some anti-feminine strictures, such as the idea that it takes the word of two women before a court to equal that of a man, exist in the general body of Muslim law. Any international campaign to right such wrongs must begin with the easier and move to the more difficult, but the world should develop a willingness to educate and retrain people away from moral underdevelopment as much as from material underdevelopment. This development strategy should also be introduced in the trusteeship period as described above. Such a use of "colonialism" was often practiced by the British, most famously by their prohibition of the Hindu suttee in India.
Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
